<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Equipment leases – Capital Lease vs Operating Lease structures	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://leaseguy.crestcapital.com/equipment-financing/capital-lease-vs-operating-lease/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://leaseguy.crestcapital.com/equipment-financing/capital-lease-vs-operating-lease/</link>
	<description>Life in the Finance Lane</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 14:42:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: theLeaseGuy		</title>
		<link>https://leaseguy.crestcapital.com/equipment-financing/capital-lease-vs-operating-lease/#comment-127047</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theLeaseGuy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 21:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leaseguy.crestcapital.com/?p=2162#comment-127047</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://leaseguy.crestcapital.com/equipment-financing/capital-lease-vs-operating-lease/#comment-127032&quot;&gt;Scott&lt;/a&gt;.

Hello Scott. You&#039;re correct. An &#039;Operating Lease&#039; term is by definition short compared to the useful life of the equipment. To achieve any operating lease, the lender must assume the risk that the equipment will be worth an imputed $amount large enough to not lose money at the end of the lease term. One solution could be shorten the term from 5 years down to 3 years so the equipment retains more value at end of lease term - but equipment subject to rapid technical obsolescence is never a good candidate for an Operating Lease structure. In those cases, a &quot;First Amendment&quot; structure that requires the Lessee to either release the equipment or buy it for the stated value is the only method to achieve Operating Lease status for the initial lease term. Thanks. Fletch]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://leaseguy.crestcapital.com/equipment-financing/capital-lease-vs-operating-lease/#comment-127032">Scott</a>.</p>
<p>Hello Scott. You&#8217;re correct. An &#8216;Operating Lease&#8217; term is by definition short compared to the useful life of the equipment. To achieve any operating lease, the lender must assume the risk that the equipment will be worth an imputed $amount large enough to not lose money at the end of the lease term. One solution could be shorten the term from 5 years down to 3 years so the equipment retains more value at end of lease term &#8211; but equipment subject to rapid technical obsolescence is never a good candidate for an Operating Lease structure. In those cases, a &#8220;First Amendment&#8221; structure that requires the Lessee to either release the equipment or buy it for the stated value is the only method to achieve Operating Lease status for the initial lease term. Thanks. Fletch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scott		</title>
		<link>https://leaseguy.crestcapital.com/equipment-financing/capital-lease-vs-operating-lease/#comment-127032</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leaseguy.crestcapital.com/?p=2162#comment-127032</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have a question regarding ADP equipment and operating leases.  In the past I thought most ADP equipment feel under the category of operating lease.  However if you look at the useful life / value of most ADP equipment after say 5 years it is probably low.  So that means in almost all cases you have used 75% or better of the assets value.  How could that ever be classified as anything other than a capital lease??]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question regarding ADP equipment and operating leases.  In the past I thought most ADP equipment feel under the category of operating lease.  However if you look at the useful life / value of most ADP equipment after say 5 years it is probably low.  So that means in almost all cases you have used 75% or better of the assets value.  How could that ever be classified as anything other than a capital lease??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
